Featured
Table of Contents
Specifically CMOs and those accountable for a company's marketing success. AI-generated responses look like a direct threat to the traditional natural traffic sites utilized to get from search engines. Before, you had to click a website to see the outcomes. Today, LLMs simply rip the material on sites and individuals no longer need to visit a website any longer.
While I personally think this danger is blown entirely out of percentage (based upon information from sites I've personally seen), I do not think it's an excuse to disregard it totally. From my own experience growing both blogs and YouTube channels, especially to offer something, I can tell you that video converts way more than composed material.
It's a lot simpler to inform if somebody is lying or full of it if you can see their facial expressions and their tone of voice. YouTube needs to certainly be in your SEO and material strategy.
And since you have developed the trust with video, your conventional SEO efforts will convert much better. There's even more to it. Earlier this year, I had a hunch that if I turned a few of my finest ranking article into YouTube videos, and embedded them into my existing article, my article would rank even better.
How to Measure the Success of TopI made a YouTube video about the subject, embedded it into that blog site post, and I have actually been ranking # 1 since.
In 2025, we saw everyone talking about how AI search was going to take over Google. Beyond just SEO, the marketing community as a whole begun to get bombarded with influencers trying to ride the AI hype train.
It became hard to find relied on sources that weren't prejudiced or had a covert program to offer us something. While I do believe there are benefits to utilizing LLMs in our workflows, I do think it has actually been overhyped. And in 2026, I forecast many online marketers will understand that ChatGPT and Perplexity are simply a little part of the SEO market.
Google still controls 90% market share and with its AI Mode and AI Overviews, it remains in the ideal position to win the AI online search engine race. Browse behavior hasn't fundamentally shifted far from Google. Beyond simply that, there are a few things that have actually rubbed me the wrong way about the AI SEO pattern.
Some claim ChatGPT has a 16% discussion rate and is much better by more than 2X compared to Google. What these marketers do not recognize is that Things like homepages, pricing pages, or bottom of funnel content, tends to be shown in ChatGPT. The educational top of funnel content is "consumed" by LLMs and shown to users without anywhere to click.
Google's conversion rates reveal less because the traffic is greater due to it being diluted by all the top of funnel material that is in the equation. Other things like how ChatGPT can make things up, it never completely follows prompts properly (i.e.
I do still believe that larger companies will business aside an experimental budget to budget plan things like ChatGPT apps and other AI SEO tools.
Don't do it. These strategies might work now in ChatGPT and other LLMs, but they're short-term plays that will eventually get punished. Focus on white hat techniques that construct genuine authority and trust with time instead of going after fast wins that won't last. The 2000s are back. Scammy keyword stuffing techniques, spending for low-quality backlinks, delivering thousands of useless posts all in the name of ranking high.
Today, the algorithm is mature enough to overlook all that nonsense. ChatGPT and other LLM algorithms are not as fully grown. I can't name this individual, however I fulfilled an SEO director at a big banking company. This person told me they (and all their competitors) are producing microsites (like little blogs) on different domains.
And from there, they are utilizing their primary business domain, that has an extremely strong brand name authority, and sending out backlinks to the microsite. And this has resulted in greater rankings for their brand in LLMs like ChatGPT.It blew my mind that huge, trustworthy companies are doing this. And I realized how much black hat (or grey hat) strategies are going on behind the scenes.
In 2026, I forecast these strategies will continue to happen. Until ChatGPT's algorithm gets as clever as Google's search algorithm.
Share real insights, use your own images and videos, and construct topical authority in your niche. This is how solo developers and small teams can beat substantial brands in 2026. This is one of the biggest SEO patterns for material marketing I'm seeing right now.
You need a genuine business, be it a newsletter business, a service-based business, SaaS business, or ecommerce store. And then you include on this human-centered specific niche blogging to the website to organically grow your core product/service offering. In 2026, I forecast that Google's algorithm will continue to get smarter about which web pages consist of AI content and which don't.
In fact, I understand lots of individuals silently crushing it with AI generated material (even going after top of funnel keywords). What I am stating is that engaging, human material will outrank AI generated content with no original insights. There are two paths I see with SEO's today: Produce countless AI-generated post and get them to rank in the middle/bottom of page 1.
Produce a hundred human blog posts and get them to rank at the top of the first page. And anybody who writes much better human content will rank greater in positions 1-3. The 2nd path is slower, but can yield greater ranking positions and more trust with readers.
Latest Posts
Proven Techniques for Optimizing in AEO Systems
Aligning Strategic Goals for Search Intent
Ranking in Voice-Search Queries
